All of us know about such a new kind of food like genetically modified and it is really widespread now. But not all of us realize whether this food is healthy or harmful to our organism. This question is one of the most controversial around the world, as many environmental organizations protest against genetic engineering but many companies continue use it in food production, and moreover increase it.
The issue of GM foods has been investigated by different scientists for many years but we still don’t have a clear answer about the influences of such food on our health. The people, who approve GM products, admit that they have enhanced quality and taste. Vegetables and fruits have reduced time of maturity, fish grow faster and crops are more resistant to insects and diseases.
As to the disadvantages of using GM food, the researchers say that there can be many potential impacts on human health causing new diseases with a higher antibiotic resistance. Also it is a high probability of creation of new allergens and an initiation an allergy in humans. No less important is a loss of a fauna and flora biodiversity, a stress for animals and harm for their organisms in the ecosystem.
All these facts may seem not very convincing, but besides the foregoing benefits of GM food, the risks are really strong and impacts are dangerous. Personally, I am sure that there can be nothing better and healthier than organic food and I totally disapprove any form of genetic engineering. Thus, let’s leave in harmony with nature, eat its wholesome fruits and be incredibly sound.
EasyGoEssay.com Can Write an Original Essay for You!
Order Custom Essay Prices Starting at $10.95 per Page!
An Argument for GMO's in Foods Essay
1201 Words5 Pages
One of my favorite episodes of the television show, "The Simpsons", begins with Marge, the mother, serving her family a dinner of unusually large, genetically modified foods. Shortly after dinner is served, one of the potatoes eats a carrot. Although this example is comedic hyperbole, it is still an excellent illustration of the public perception of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) as dangerous "Frankenfoods". This perception is out of touch with the reality of GMOs and runs contrary to a large body of scientific evidence that indicates that GMOs are safe for people and our environment.
In this paper I will be focusing my attention on foods modified to produce a certain insecticidal protein known as Bt. I…show more content…
As long as Bt and non-Bt are crops are segregated and planted adequate distances away from each other, they will pollinate themselves well before Bt pollen arrives via wind or insects. The same EPA report concludes that, in the United States, the transfer of genes to wild species is also quite low. For Bt corn and potatoes the risk is essentially zero since wild varieties do not exist here. Bt cotton is also grown in the U.S., and in Southern Florida and Hawaii where wild varieties exist the EPA has banned Bt cotton cultivation. Thus, limiting the planting of Bt crops to areas where they have no native relatives negates the problem.
The other major environmental concern, that Bt toxins pose a threat to non-target (species other than the pests which are trying to be eliminated and/or controlled) invertebrate and microbe species is similarly unfounded. EPA, 2001 concluded that:
Bt [proteins] have been tested against a wide variety of terrestrial and aquatic invertebrates including earthworms, collembola, daphnids, insect predators and parasites, spiders, and honeybees and have been shown to have a high degree of safety for these non-target organisms. In most cases, no adverse effects were observed even though test populations were exposed to levels of toxin in excess of 500-1,000-fold concentrations than they would be expected to encounter under field conditions.
This low risk to non-target species contrasts sharply with broad-spectrum