he most common and perhaps the most serious error in modern political and social comment comes from overestimating the power of political and public action. We rejoice in believing that for better, and not too infrequently for worse, leaders-people-are in charge. All but invariably there is a deeper force to which the oratory and the action respond. I do not wish to deny or denigrate the role of political leadership; I will have something to urge in this regard later in this paper. I do wish to suggest that much, indeed most, political action is shaped by deeper change, by independently controlling trends. So it is with the greatest of political conflicts of our time, that of national interest as opposed to international, transnational concern and responsibility. Here, the history, not the public action, is indeed the controlling force.
|Opposite: Detail of the centre panel of a mural depicting "Man's struggle for peace", in which a giant, four-armed figure implants the emblem of the United Nations. Created by Jose Vela Zanetti of the Dominican Republic under a fellowship from the John Simon Guggenheim Memorial Foundation, the mural begins at the left with the destruction of the family and ends at the right with its resurrection and a bright eyed child looking toward a generation of peace.|
The history begins with agriculture and the two primary essentials of life-food and textiles-which it provided. For both of these, land is essential; from both came the primal role of those who owned or worked the land. Commonly this awarded power to the landed aristocracy; this in turn held dominance over a peasant population distributed over the realm.
Subject to some exceptions, this was the basis for a strongly nationalist response. Territory was the essence of economic position and political power; it was strongly sought and defended. A peasantry was amply available for both defense and aggression, which often had a distinctly recreational aspect. This situation was most extreme in Europe and Asia. The United States, Canada and in some measure Latin America were spared because land was essentially a free good. But the United States, as recently as the last century, endured a bitter conflict with its agricultural and feudal South.
ith the French Revolution and the Industrial Revolution came a major change. Power passed from the landlord to the capitalist. Here too there was a strong economic foundation for nationalism. Markets, including those of the new arrivals on the industrial scene, needed, sought and received tariff protection on national grounds. And as the landed classes once brought nationalism and patriotism to the support of landed interests, so the new industrialists made it the hallmark and servant of their economic interests. As war once protected or expanded landed territory, so it now returned revenue to those who directly or indirectly armed the military forces. And war, as ever, deepened and was used to deepen nationalist passion. Here in microcosm was the history of the first half of the present century with its two infinitely cruel and devastating conflicts. Here is the situation which in the second half of the century we escaped. Here too there are underlying economic forces. In these days, we do not speak of economic determinism; there is a grave Marxist overtone which the careful scholar avoids. However, the reality intrudes.
In the last 50 years, those since the Second World War, there has been a massive and again controlling economic and social change. This has been the internationalization of economic and larger social life. There has also been an expanding role of purely national needs and the response. The two we find in constant, vigorous conflict. Much political action and agitation, much economic and social comment succumbs to one or the other side of this conflict.
he most visible, most mentioned force for internationalism has, of course, been international trade. This was not, much as we may regret it, the result of a new economic enlightenment. It was brought about by a marked change in the nature of the national and international trading community. Once there were nationally separate firms acting in relatively small markets. These markets were a private preserve. The modern large enterprise sweeps across national frontiers. Tariffs and other restraints, once a protection, are now an aggravation. Once the case for free trade rested on efficiency, production where at best cost, or to be more precise, that which reflected comparative advantage. This refined and intellectually delectable view still lurks in the deeper recesses of the economic mind. It has been swept into irrelevance by corporate market power and its pursuit.
The transnational character of modern economic life is a controlling fact of our time. Political oratory, social comment and the meetings of the "Group of 7" leaders all reflect this fact. But this would be of small effect in the absence of the underlying and controlling economic force.
This great international thrust has not been of trade alone. Travel, technology and communications, the arts and entertainment have also had a strong international thrust. All enjoy a substantial measure of social acceptance. (Even morally depraved television programmes are now readily tolerated.) Close and amiable international relations has its advocates. Also its public encouragement. Beneath and dominant, however, is the larger pressure of economic and social change. Nor in a world which in the course of one half century saw the incomparable cruelty of two wars, soldiers and citizens assigned to fear and then to death, can this be regretted. But the story is not complete.
There have also over the last half century, and in Europe over an even longer time, been powerful forces enforcing and reinforcing nationalism. In the new world, this came more or less automatically with the end of colonialism. There was a national entity to celebrate and defend. Colonialism and its demise, I would note, also had a strong element of economic determinism. Colonies, once a source of raw materials, once a valued and protected market, were set aside by the larger thrust of trade between developed nations and by the new market reward from domestic economic growth. It has been estimated that the loss by Holland of her great Indonesian empire was made up for by a couple of years of international economic growth. In the United States, the Philippines were allowed silently to slip away-no economic lobby raised strong objections. The new countries were free to celebrate their newly acquired independence-a new and proudly acclaimed nationalism.
n the economically advanced lands also, sovereignty is routinely celebrated in political oratory, on television, in print. Patriotism, Dr. Johnson observed, is the last resort of the scoundrel. He sadly underestimated its power; for many, it comes close to being a religious rite. One can be forgiven for retreating even from the love for a long-time marriage partner. Retreat from love for country is a more serious matter. And here too there is a deeper force.
That is the modern welfare State. Capitalism as it developed in the last century had a viciously cruel aspect. It relegated the unneeded without income into unemployment, the old into poverty, the ill into sickness and death. And it left a large fringe of the population without either income or the hope for employment. From production, finance and from its products, there were other threats to well-being. All of these the national State addressed. The modern economy is international; with rare exceptions, however, its adverse human effects are a national concern. From this too comes a solid support of modern nationalism. Here in the United States, a vocal current of political thought, or what is so designated, urges a return to the economic and social world of the nineteenth century or that before. It will not happen; the welfare State is at the hard core of modern nationalism in the more fortunate countries of the world. What is the longer-run answer to this conflict?
The international thrust, economic, cultural, technological, in modern times must be accepted. It is indeed controlling. And none can doubt that it is much to be preferred to the war-inducing nationalism of earlier times. It offers instead a relatively civilized relationship between the peoples of the globe. Those who speak for a narrow nationalism are out of step with this great force of history. Like all others, they must be allowed their voice. That should not contribute to belief or acceptance. We see here the greatest social and political problem of our time. That is the reconciliation of modern internationalism in all its inevitability with both its own needed guidance and constraints, and with the humane social protection accorded by the welfare State.
International trade and financial relationships cannot be without a measure of public supervision; the opportunities for deviant behaviour and action are beyond doubt-their exploitation are in the press and on television every day. There must also be international action to protect and coordinate the welfare measures of individual States-unemployment security, social security, health care, education, and the budget and budget deficit, to mention only the most obvious needs. Such coordination, now a matter of no slight effort in Europe, must be a larger international action. Only this will keep the larger internationalism from being in conflict with the national commitment to social well-being. There is no conflict it is more essential that we avoid, much as it would be welcomed in one retrograde political view.
ver the longer time, there is a larger, more comprehensive institutional change that must eventually be faced and must now be discussed. The problem is that our institutional structure in international relations is now out of step with the new reality. The United Nations of which I have long been and remain a strong supporter is risking obsolescence. It is not fully abreast of the great change in the national, international context.
|Significantly, it remains in both structure and competence in the age of the dominant nation State. These and their then unchallenged dominance were what brought the United Nations into existence. It was these that gave it its structure. The Second World War had shown beyond any conceivable doubt the need for a mediating instrument, one that would in the future avert such tragedy. National sovereignty was accepted; it was only that it must not lead to war, along with action, as necessary, to resolve lesser disputes. The context, to repeat, was still the independent nation State. The penumbra of accompanying and supporting institutions-the World Bank, the International Monetary Fund-extended and supplemented that responsibility. At the centre was still the older question of the relations between nation States.|
As will be evident, I associate this with the underlying thrust to economic, financial, cultural, technological, scientific and other closer association. But this in turn has spawned new problems-trade relations and associated differences and disputes; international financial transactions and associated economic disturbance and malpractice; speculation and speculative collapse; the associated threat of boom and recession; the global threat to the environment; and the continuing and socially demanding presence of the poor of the planet. The several agencies of the United Nations-the Economic and Social Council, the Department of Humanitarian Affairs-and the outlying work of the World Bank and the International Monetary Fund and yet other international agencies do not reflect and respond in any unified and adequate way to the modern reality. The United Nations agencies have discussion, but alas not power. This we must now correct.
he central role and responsibility is that of the United Nations. That is the basic institution, the powerful first step. But the United Nations role must now be open to major discussion-and change. The day will come I believe for a legislative oversight of the world economic and social system, the first step toward world government. And a tax base-a beginning might well be the tax on international financial transactions proposed by Professor James Tobin-the Tobin tax. And more generally and urgently, it must have responsibility in keeping with the new problems-economic, financial, cultural-of internationalism, of the modern global village and the protection of the welfare State.
This is not in the area of fantasy. Rather, it is action to accommodate to the modern reality. It is what the underlying and controlling economic and social change has made essential. Let us now begin the serious discussion.
The United Nations
- Length: 310 words (0.9 double-spaced pages)
- Rating: Excellent
The United Nations
Fifty-one countries established the United Nations also known as the UN on October 24, 1945 with the intentions of preserving peace through international cooperation and collective security. Over the years the UN has grown in numbers to include 185 countries, thus making the organization and its family of agencies the largest in an effort to promote world stability. Since 1954 the UN and its organizations have received the Nobel Peace Prize on 5 separate occasions. The first in 1954 awarded to the Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees, Geneva, for its assistance to refugees, and finally in 1988 to the United Nations Peace-keeping Forces, for its peace-keeping operations. As you can see, the United Nations efforts have not gone without notice.
The UN has made strides toward and continues to fight for world peace, but this however is not the only function of the agency. Environmental protection, Human rights, health and medical research, alleviation of poverty and economic development, emergency and disaster relief, and labor and workers' rights are just a sample of what the UN continues to battle as the year 2000 approaches.
The United Nations has made many achievements since the agreement made in 1945. The efforts of the UN helped end the apartheid in South Africa allowing the citizens of South Africa equal participation in the Elections of April 1994 followed by a consensus in choosing a form of government. 90 percent of children in developing countries attend school and 60 percent of adults in these countries can read and write thanks to the UN and the struggle to improve education in developing countries. Over 300 international treaties have been created through United Nations efforts to strengthen international law. These achievements and many others encourage people like myself to promote and praise the United Nations.
Without the UN the world would be a bigger place full of confusion and hatred. The efforts of this world organization have improved global life for all of its citizens and will continue to do so for many years to come.
How to Cite this Page
|The United Nations Essay - The United Nations Fifty-one countries established the United Nations also known as the UN on October 24, 1945 with the intentions of preserving peace through international cooperation and collective security. Over the years the UN has grown in numbers to include 185 countries, thus making the organization and its family of agencies the largest in an effort to promote world stability. Since 1954 the UN and its organizations have received the Nobel Peace Prize on 5 separate occasions. The first in 1954 awarded to the Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees, Geneva, for its assistance to refugees, and finally in 1988 to the United Nations Peace-keeping Forces, for its pea... [tags: United Nations Essay]||310 words|
| The United Nations Essay - Around the time of November 2013 the United States received reports of a possible war threat from North Korea with nuclear weapons they posses. Sources say they are working on a KN-08 missile, an intercontinental range weapon which has the potential threat to target America. Russia on March 2014 threaten Ukrainian forces with a full-scale attack towards their country, if they refuse to lower their weapons and surrender for the take over of Crimea. Since in 1991, the Soviet Union went to a complete collapse, Russia began efforts to claiming the island Crimea from Ukraine, as part of their country once again.... [tags: United States, North Korea, World History]|
:: 2 Works Cited
| Essay about The United Nations - With a charter established in 1945, the United Nations began its mission to promote peace and security . International collaboration led to the ratification of the charter by five country representatives at the time: China, France, The Soviet-Union, The United Kingdom and The United States; the UN officially came into existence October 24 1945. Each year since the day of ratification, UN day’s celebration reminds the world of their objective to promote respect for human rights, gender equality; the advancement of women, protecting the environment, fighting disease and reducing poverty.... [tags: History]|
:: 6 Works Cited
|Essay on The United Nations - The United Nations The United Nations, with its rigid moral and political limitations against force, has become a benchmark of peace and a social achievement of modern times. From war torn Europe, the United Nations developed from five major powers with an initial goal to prevent the spread of warfare through peaceful means and to establish and maintain fundamental human rights. Through the past fifty years, this organization has broadened its horizons with auxiliary organizations from peace keeping missions to humanitarian aid, to economic development.... [tags: Papers]||2268 words|
|Essay about The United Nations - The United Nations All over the world, soldiers in the UN’s blue helmets or hats have risked their lives trying to stop wars. In 1988 they received one of the worlds highest honors, the Nobel Peace Prize. Canadians were proud, because their soldiers and aircrew had shared in almost every UN peacekeeping mission since 1948. The United Nations is an international organization that consists of 184 nations. They have joined together to prevent war, promote peace security and social progress, and also to develop friendly relations among nations around the world.... [tags: essays research papers]||2946 words|
|United NAtions Essay examples - United Nations “5 W’s” What: The political organization established 1945 by the allied powers who were later joined by other nations Who: Today there are 191 nations in the United Nations but It was originally started by those who were fighting against the axis powers. Where: It was decided to have it located in the Eastern United States, they bought land with money given by John D. Rockefeller Jr. along the East River in NYC. When: The United Nations was officially coined such in 1941 by President Franklin D.... [tags: essays research papers]||386 words|
|Essay on United Nations - United Nations The League of Nations now called the United Nations was founded in 1919. The League of Nations was composed shortly after the first world war in order to prevent any more wars. The League of Nations collapsed in 1939. On January 1 of 1942 United Nations was born. During WWII, 26 nations joined their forces to continue fighting against the Axis Powers. The United Nations Charter was drawn up by representatives of 51 nations and signed on June 26, 1945. The United Nations was officially born on October 24, 1945 when the Charter was authorized by China, USSR, France, UK, USA and many other nations.... [tags: essays papers]||1024 words|
|united nations Essay examples - UN:United Nations The United Nations was established on October 29, 1945. The United Nations was formed right after World War 2. It was also formed for international assembly of Nations to bring world peace. The United Nations is the successor of the league of Nations, a kind of the same organizationformed after World War 1 that failed to stop another war. The United Nations was first outlined in the Dumbarton Oaks Proposal of 1944. In the Yalta confrence the biggest threes of those times ,United States,Soviet Union, and Great Britian.... [tags: essays research papers]||418 words|
|United Nations Essay examples - Describe the goal and functions of the United Nations. Upon the conclus5ion of WWII, the 1945 San Francisco Conference created the provisions for the United Nations. The purpose of this multinational organization was to promote international peace and security, settlement of disputes between nations by peaceful means, develop friendly relations with other nations, and the international cooperation to solve global social, economic, and cultural problems. To accomplish this agenda, the United Nations is divided into six departments, all having their own specific duties.... [tags: Free Essays]||375 words|
|United Nations Essays - The United Nations 1. As far as peace keeping methods go, the reputation of the United Nations is very pitiable. This is not only because they have not been doing their job to it’s fullest extent, but also because the member states on the security council haven’t given the UN the power it needs if it is to be a successful force in peace keeping methods. 2. The United Nation idea was first brought to head during World War II, when 26 nations of the world pledged to work together as one. The United Nations was officially operational as of the 24th of October 1951, with a minor 51 countries signing the UN charter.... [tags: essays research papers]||747 words|
United Nations International Cooperation Environmental Protection Medical Research International Law World Peace Developing Countries Efforts Thanks
We need to abide by the principles of the UN charter: maintain international peace and security, develop friendly relations among nations, cooperate in solving international problems, promoting respect for human rights, and to be a center for harmonizing the actions of nations if we wish to solve many of the problems facing our world today and for years to come.